21 September 2010

From Dictynna: See you in mid- to late-December...

I'm suspending posting until after my college course is done. In the meantime, be sure to visit some of my favorite news sources:

AlterNet

BuzzFlash

Campaign For America's Future

Common Dreams | News & Views

New York Times

Raw Story

The Baseline Scenario

Digby - Hullabaloo

Paul Krugman - Op-Ed Columnist - New York Times Blog

New York Review of Books

19 September 2010

September 19, 2010

Holt: FBI anthrax investigation is itself subject of probe

After years of questioning the conclusion and methods of an FBI investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five people and sickened dozens of others, Rep. Rush Holt (D-Hopewell) announced yesterday that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is opening an inquiry into the matter.

Holt, along with a handful of other legislators, had sent a letter to the GAO in May requesting an investigation into the FBI’s handling of the case. The FBI officially closed the case in February after concluding in 2008 that Dr. Bruce Ivins, a former biodefense scientist, was the sole culprit in the attacks.

Senate hopeful O'Donnell admits "dabbling" in witchcraft

Delaware's GOP Senate nominee, Christine O'Donnell, admitted to "dabbling into witchcraft" during a clip aired Friday night on Bill Maher's HBO show "Real Time."

The clip was filmed, but not aired, a decade ago when O'Donnell was a part-time pundit on Maher's "Politically Incorrect."

"I dabbled into witchcraft — I never joined a coven," she said. "But I did, I did. I dabbled into witchcraft.

Editorial: The Secret Election

For all the headlines about the Tea Party and blind voter anger, the most disturbing story of this year’s election is embodied in an odd combination of numbers and letters: 501(c)(4). That is the legal designation for the advocacy committees that are sucking in many millions of anonymous corporate dollars, making this the most secretive election cycle since the Watergate years.

As Michael Luo reported in The Times last week, the battle for Congress is largely being financed by a small corps of wealthy individuals and corporations whose names may never be known to the public. And the full brunt of that spending — most of it going to Republican candidates — has yet to be felt in this campaign.

Corporations got the power to pour anonymous money into elections from Supreme Court and Federal Election Commission decisions in the last two years, culminating in the Citizens United opinion earlier this year. The effect is drastic: In 2004 and 2006, virtually all independent groups receiving electioneering donations revealed their donors. In 2008, less than half of the groups reported their donors, according to a study issued last week by the watchdog group Public Citizen. So far this year, only 32 percent of the groups have done so.

Classified: Perverting Democracy by Preventing Disclosure

Whether you believe the US Constitution should be applied literally or think the authors intentionally left room for interpretation by future generations, it is generally accepted that our nation’s founding document originates form the notion that government must be guided by the will of those who consent to be governed.

The lifeblood of any such democracy is an informed citizenry, which, provided with facts and context, can properly assess the course of the government's actions. Informed decision-making, in turn, requires open access to relevant information. Unfortunately, over the past several years, we in the United States have seen a concerted effort by our government to prevent massive amounts of revealing information from ever seeing the light of day.